Stop guessing.
Get a verdict.

The Evaluation Agent runs structured interviews, then hands your hiring manager a clear recommendation — with the reasoning, evidence, and transcript behind it. A decision they can actually defend, not a data dump.

Live · Scorecard
Confidence 94%
0/ 100

Overall

Strong Hire

Confident on system trade-offs; advance with a scale probe.

Tech92
Comms84
Culture88
Motiv.90
Exp.81

Strengths

System-design depth
Strong React fundamentals

Watch

Leadership scope unproven
Probe scale experience

Evidence

Transcript
Recording
Full report
Defensible
LW

Lin Wei

Sr. React · Singapore · Report delivered to hiring manager

Report

Scored on five dimensions

Tech, comms, culture, motivation, experience.

Bias-checked and consistent

Same rubric, every candidate, every round.

A report you can defend

Evidence, transcript and rationale in one view.

It runs the interview. You make the call.

Three clean stages: interview, score, report. Same rubric for every candidate. No interviewer drift.

01 · Interview
Rec · live
12:22
P

Lin Wei

Sr. React · Tech round

AI

Walk me through your reconnection logic.

You

Sure — I used a backoff with jitter, then…

Transcribing↗ scoring live

Structured, adaptive, on the record.

Role-specific question sets run via voice or chat. Branching logic probes deeper where it matters.

02 · Score

Composite

87/100

Strong hire
Technical
92
Communication
84
Culture fit
88
Motivation
90
Experience
81

Five dimensions. Weighted to the role.

Technical, communication, culture, motivation, experience. Your weights, applied consistently.

03 · Report
Evaluation report Ready
Composite score · 87
Strengths & concerns drafted
Transcript + recording attached
RecommendationAuto-generated
87

Strong hire

Above threshold across all five dimensions.

One document. Every signal.

Composite score, plain-English rationale, transcript and recording. Ready before the next round.

One document. Every signal.

Same rubric, same thresholds, every candidate — delivered as one structured, defensible scorecard.

Candidate

Lin Wei

Role

Sr. React Dev

Round

Round 2 · Tech

Experience

6 yrs

Composite scoreStrong hire ✓

87/100

Psychometric profile

TECHCOMMSCULTUREDRIVEEXP
Structured thinking90
Ownership86
Collaboration82
Resilience77

Key insights

  • Technical depth 18 pts above role average.
  • Structured answers, one nudge needed.
  • Review-first habits match the team.
  • Probe: system design at scale.

Explore

Recording · 28:14Generated · today, 11:42

Composite scoring

One weighted score with the full breakdown behind it — technical, culture, drive, experience.

Psychometric profile

Traits mapped against the role benchmark, so you see fit — not just performance on the day.

Clear recommendation

Hire / no-hire with the reasoning, key insights and the exact probes for the next round.

Shortlist comparison

Every candidate side by side on the same rubric, ranked and easy to defend to the hiring manager.

Bias-audited

Same questions, same rubric and same thresholds for every candidate, every single time.

Defensible

Full transcript, audio recording and rationale stored with the score.

90%

First-round pass rate on candidates pre-evaluated

5

Dimensions scored against your role-specific rubric

50%

Less interviewer load per hire across customers

100%

Of sessions documented with transcript and report

FAQ

Everything about AI candidate evaluation.

Find answers to frequently asked questions about our evaluation capabilities.

The Evaluation Agent scores every candidate across five dimensions: technical ability (role-specific), communication (clarity, confidence, structure), culture fit (values alignment, collaboration style), motivation (genuine interest in the role and company), and experience (relevance and depth of background). Each dimension has a score and a plain-English observation.

Ready to evaluate?

Every candidate,
pre-evaluated.

Set the rubric once. Watch your hiring decisions become defensible.